I honestly didn’t know what to expect when I picked up this book. Obviously, it’s about a dog, since there’s one on the cover. (As an aside: the illustrations in the book are done by Brian Moser, who also did the edition of Dracula I read. They were fabulous.) I also knew it was considered a classic. But beyond that I had no idea what to expect.
I was suitably impressed.
For those who don’t know: it’s the story of Buck, a husky. He was initially a pet, living a comfortable life in southern California, about the turn of the century, until one of his master’s servants sold him to pay off his gambling debts. Buck then found himself shipped north to Canada/Alaska, and was beaten and trained as a sled dog. He learned the ropes (unlike many “Southerner” dogs, who died from the hardship and the work), and was eventually passed through several masters. And practically run to death. He was saved by his last master, and stayed with him for while. Buck, however, became more and more restless, hearing (sorry), the call of the wild, until he finally left humanity (if that can be possible for a dog) altogether, joining the wolves in the end.
London is a tight writer — almost a poet — in that no word is wasted. There is so much packed into each sentence, into each page, that even though the book is only 111 pages long, it feels complete. There really was nothing missing, or anything superfluous. I’m also not one to enjoy pages and pages of narrative, but in this case, I was captivated. I liked how London treated the dogs, Buck especially. I felt like I knew Buck, even though he never spoke a word. He was personified for me, with emotions (fear, rage, jealousy, love), and with ambitions and desires. And the emotion of the book: it’s an adventure story, but it’s full of pain and love and anger and disappointment and happiness. I’m still amazed at how much London captured through the eyes of a dog.
I suppose this one could be easily written off as one of those English-major-only books, or perhaps one of those animal-lover-only books, but it’s not. (Since I’m neither of those….) It truly is a classic: something that can be enjoyed by everyone, on some level. It really is worth the time spent reading it.
If you ever have the opportunity, you should look into London’s life (or even read a biography). He’s one of the few authors where it’s well-noted that his life was as interesting/exciting if not more so than his books.
LikeLike
What a cool choice of a book to review! I didn’t know much about this novel. I’ve only tried to read one Jack London novel–the one about reincarnation–and I was unable to get through it (too much torture). This one looks like an easier read.
LikeLike
I love this book. Have you read its counterpart, White Fang? Just as interesting, but about a wolf that gets tamed, instead of a dog running off into the wild. >>London wrote a book about reincarnation? I’ve never heard of <>that<>. What’s the title?
LikeLike
My family are dog lovers for sure. My children have me read them their favorite < HREF="http://www.joyfulpaws.com/" REL="nofollow">dog book<>, “Frankie the Walk ‘N Roll Dog” by Barbara Techel all the time. The Call of the Wild seems to be for older children or adults, so I will have to give it a try.
LikeLike
I’m so glad you liked this one. It is one of my favorites. You described his writing perfectly-almost like poetry in its spare economy.
LikeLike
bookchronicle — I would be very interested in that; there was a little author bio at the end of Call of the Wild, and it piqued my interest.>>Jeane — I checked it out for my 12 year old, who liked it, but I haven’t read it. I’ll probably get around to it sooner or later. >>Tia — reincarnation? Wow. The one I was supposed to read for my in person book group was In the Shadow of My Valley, about his life farming in mid-California. I couldn’t find a copy, and so I read Call of the Wild instead. Not sorry I did, either. π
LikeLike