Book to Movie Friday: Inkheart

About a year ago, I put up a books and their movie adaptations post. Since it seems that I’ve been seeing quite a few movies (mostly intentionally) lately that have been based on books, I thought it would be fun to post my thoughts on them on occasional Fridays. I have to add that I’m a horrid movie reviewer — I generally like everything to some extent — but I can compare them to the books, which I’m pretty good at. The links are to my review of the book.

Inkheart: I have to say, first, that I like anything Brendan Fraser’s been in (that I’ve seen). Some I like more than others, but generally, I find him imminently watchable. That said, I really liked Inkheart. It’s different than the book, but in a way that makes it a good movie.

They kept the basic elements of the story (from what I remember; it’s been a while since I read the book, and that could have affected the way I saw the movie), but fleshed it out and changed it in a way to make it a decent movie. (Unlike the Harry Potter movies, which are generally scenes from the book splashed on the screen.) They contained the story to a single movie — there’s no need for sequels, like the book — and moved elements around so that it kept up a fairly brisk pace. And, as I think Jen Robinson noted, it truly is a middle grade movie: it is Meggie, more than Mo, who drives the plot and comes up with a brilliant solution to the crisis they are all in. I thought it was well cast: Andy Sirkis was perfect as Capricorn, as was (surprisingly) Brendan Fraser as Mo, and Eliza Hope Bennett as Meggie, and Paul Bettany as Dustfinger. But the show stealer was Helen Mirren as Elinor. She was brilliant. She was perfect. I loved her.

One more note: I took M to see the movie, and after finishing it, she wanted to read Inkspell (she had no desire to before that, even though she’s read Inkheart). That’s got to say something.

Verdict: Not as good as the book, but pretty darn close.

4 thoughts on “Book to Movie Friday: Inkheart

  1. I actually haven’t seen it yet. But I’m heartened by your review. It’s interesting that you should talk about it as a middle grade book, because my problem with the last book in the series was that I felt like Meggie was a bit marginalized, and the whole thing was about Mo. I’m SO glad that the movie of Inkheart is about Meggie. I mean, I love Brendan Fraser, too, but it’s a movie for kids, after all. Did you know that Cornelia Funke has said that she had Fraser in mind when she came up with Mo as a character? Anyway, thanks for the review!

    Like

  2. I haven’t seen it yet, but my daughter was furious with some of the changes. I think she’s a bit rigid about changes that need to be made to make a movie. I liked your explanation. It also helps to have time between reading the book and seeing the movie.

    Like

  3. I haven’t read the last book, Jen, but that’s sad that’s it’s more about Mo than Meggie. It is a kid’s book, after all. πŸ™‚And, yeah, I knew that she had Fraser in mind for Mo, but honestly, until I saw the movie, I thought it was more a fangirl thing than something he could actually pull off (that’s bad; I adore the man, and yet I underestimate him as an actor…). But, watching him be Mo (and I know he’s been accused of just going through the motions, but it worked for me), I think she was right to pattern Mo after him.Booklogged, I think you’re right: it does help having time between reading the book and seeing the movie.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jen Robinson Cancel reply