Banker to the Poor

Micro-lending and the Battle Against World Poverty
by Muhammad Yunus
age: any
First sentence: “In the yer 1974 Bangladesh fell into the grip of famine.”

I really don’t know how to write this review without sounding crass, selfish, uppity, obnoxious… because I didn’t finish the book. Strike that: couldn’t finish the book. It bored me. To tears.

It’s essentially a memoir by the man — Yunus — who founded Grameen Bank, an organization that gives micro-loans (those of piddly amounts that “normal” banks won’t handle) to people way, way below the poverty line. It’s less about his life, though, and more about the struggles and trials he had in setting up this idea and the challenges and experiences he had getting it to work.

I thought that would be interesting. But Yunus is a boring writer. He’s not maudlin, something which I appreciated, but it’s essentially a list: he had this idea, he set about getting it to work, he ran across some resisitance, he happened to know someone high up in the government, he got past the resistance. Yeah. Whatever.

As I said, I sound crass. I should be insterested and moved and touched by this man’s efforts to help those with much, much less. And I am; he’s going whatever good he can, working within the system rather than trying to reinvent it (mostly). But, his book, I am sorry to say, is not nearly as good as his ideas.

3 thoughts on “Banker to the Poor

  1. I don’t think you sound crass at all. The book really is boring if you’re not already interested in microfinance, and who’s interested in everything? Yunus isn’t an engaging writer, and I didn’t think the book was balanced.

    Like

  2. I agree, you don’t sound crass at all. We are not required to like books only because they are written by people working for a good cause, like Yunus is. I mean, not everyone can be a writer, even though I very often see how a lot of people think they can. Just because one’s story is interesting doesn’t mean it automatically has to be written down. Maybe he should have hired a real author that would have done a better job.

    Like

  3. I think I was more inclined to like it because I was already really interested, if that makes sense. My sister and brother in law have been telling me about his ideas for a couple years now, so I was ready to know more πŸ™‚

    Like

Leave a reply to lilly Cancel reply